I. Centralized Procurement Signal: The Iteration of Wi-Fi 7 for Home Gateways Enters Substantive Stage
The centralized procurement of home network terminals completed by China Telecom and China Mobile in 2026 sends a clear signal to the industry: the role of Wi-Fi 7 in operators' home gateways and FTTR products is shifting from "flagship configuration" to "mainstream configuration" .
In China Mobile's 2026-2027 smart home gateway centralized procurement, Tianyi Technology was shortlisted as the third successful bidder for Package 1 and the sixth successful bidder for Package 2, with an estimated value of 208 million yuan. In China Telecom's FTTR centralized procurement, Tianyi Technology won two packages, with an estimated value of 273.6 million yuan. Jiulian Technology was shortlisted for China Mobile's GPON and 10G GPON packages, with market shares of 14.63% and 12.20%, respectively.
The significance of these centralized procurements lies in the fact that operators' technology choices for home network terminals directly determine the upstream module demand structure for OEMs over the next 12 to 18 months . From a penetration rate perspective, the proportion of Wi-Fi 7 in FTTR terminals is rapidly increasing. According to IIM Information's "Global FTTR All-Optical Network Industry Outlook In-Depth Analysis Report," the proportion of FTTR terminals supporting Wi-Fi 7 is expected to reach 38.6% in 2026 , an increase of 17.2 percentage points compared to 2025. This growth rate is significant in the iteration of communication terminal technology, reflecting operators' clear willingness to invest in the evolution from "whole-house gigabit" to "whole-house Wi-Fi 7."
II. Engineering Constraints of FTTR Architecture on RF Modules
The core architecture of FTTR is a distributed network consisting of a main gateway and multiple sub-routers. Fiber optic backhaul solves the wired bandwidth problem between nodes, but the wireless coverage quality of each node directly determines the user's true perception of "gigabit throughout the house." This architecture imposes three engineering constraints on the radio frequency module that differ from those in a single-router scenario.
First, latency consistency during multi-node handover. When users move between rooms, terminal devices need to complete roaming handovers between different sub-routers. Traditional Wi-Fi roaming mechanisms experience service interruptions on the order of 100ms during handover. For real-time applications such as video calls and online games, this interruption is sufficient to cause noticeable experience degradation. Wi-Fi 7's Multi-Link Operation (MLO) and its Enhanced Single-Radio Implementation (EMLSR) significantly reduce handover interruptions through link pre-sense and fast handover mechanisms. Huawei explicitly claims an ultra-low latency of 10ms in its Wi-Fi 7 FTTR solution . This is not just marketing hype, but a scenario-based realization of Wi-Fi 7 MLO capabilities.
Second, scheduling efficiency under dense device concurrency. Modern homes typically have more than 20 devices online simultaneously, and in mid-to-high-end scenarios, this can reach over 40. While FTTR's distributed architecture expands coverage, it also means more radio frequency nodes operating in the same spectrum space, leading to increased inter-node interference and terminal scheduling complexity. Wi-Fi 7's optimized OFDMA resource scheduling and multi-link redundancy mechanisms offer far greater value in this scenario than in a single-router environment.
Third, matching the fiber backhaul bandwidth. When the fiber backhaul between the FTTR main gateway and sub-routers provides 2.5Gbps or even higher bandwidth, if the wireless side still relies on Wi-Fi 6's 160MHz channel capability, it will become a bottleneck for end-to-end throughput. Wi-Fi 7's 320MHz channel and tri-band capability enable the wireless side to have the basic bandwidth supply to match the fiber backhaul.
In this architecture, the role of the RF module is to transform the chip's protocol capabilities into a mass-producible, testable, and reliably deliverable RF subsystem. The chip provides "what it can do," while the module determines "how much it actually accomplishes."
III. Engineering Parameters and Scenario Adaptation Analysis of O2072PM/PB
The O2072PM and O2072PB modules designed by Qogrisys based on the Qualcomm QCC2072 (FastConnect C7700) platform correspond to the engineering constraints of the aforementioned FTTR/gateway scenarios in terms of parameters .
In terms of RF capabilities , the O2072PM supports the IEEE 802.11be standard, 2×2 MIMO, and tri-band 2.4/5/6GHz concurrent operation. The 6GHz band channel bandwidth can reach 320MHz , achieving a peak rate of 5.8Gbps with 4096-QAM modulation . This rate level provides ample margin in current FTTR gateway designs, matching fiber backhaul bandwidth and reserving scheduling space for multi-user concurrent scenarios.
In terms of latency control , the O2072PM supports 320MHz Enhanced Multi-Link Single Radio (eMLSR) . eMLSR, in engineering terms, means that in a single-radio hardware architecture, it uses an auxiliary radio (Aux Radio) to monitor the status of multiple frequency band links, quickly switching to a backup link when the primary link encounters interference or congestion, without undergoing a complete scan-association process . Qualcomm describes Aux Radio in its technical documentation as "automatically shutting down or waking up the primary radio by monitoring the TX/RX status," while also performing low-latency background scanning to reduce the impact of scanning on throughput . For cost-sensitive and space-constrained design scenarios such as FTTR sub-routers, eMLSR provides a feasible path to achieve near-multi-radio latency performance on a single-radio architecture.
In terms of power management , the independent listening mechanism of the Aux Radio allows the main radio to enter a low-power state when idle, and is only awakened when the auxiliary radio detects a signal that needs to be transmitted or received. This mechanism has practical significance for the heat dissipation design and long-term operating power consumption of FTTR sub-routers—distributed networking means that multiple nodes are continuously online, and the cumulative effect of power consumption of a single node cannot be ignored.
In terms of packaging , the O2072PM uses the M.2 2230 Key E standard interface, while the O2072PB is a 13×15mm surface-mount package . These two forms correspond to different overall hardware architectures: the M.2 interface is suitable for slot-based gateway/router products, while the surface-mount version is suitable for high-density onboard sub-routers or space-constrained FTTR slave gateways. This packaging option itself demonstrates engineering adaptability , as different OEMs' hardware platforms differ significantly in interface definitions, PCB space, and heat dissipation paths.
Regarding platform compatibility , the O2072PM is compatible with Intel x86 platforms for kernel versions 5.15.24+, 6.1.99, and 6.12.0, and also has V1 compatibility with OpenWrt . This information is valuable for OEMs in their selection process: the maturity of driver compatibility directly impacts product development cycles and post-mass production stability risks . Mature compatibility with Linux platforms means that gateway solutions based on x86 or ARM Linux can complete RF subsystem debugging in a shorter time, while OpenWrt compatibility provides a foundation for customized routing/gateway products.
IV. The Value Position of the Module Segment in the Industry Chain
According to IIM Information's "Global and China WiFi Module Market Analysis and Survey Report," the global Wi-Fi module market size is projected to reach US$16.82 billion in 2026 , with Wi-Fi 7 module shipments expected to climb to 17.2% , reaching approximately 234 million units for the year. IndexBox's market analysis further indicates that Wi-Fi 7 modules have a 40% to 70% price premium compared to their predecessors , and high-end modules (tri-band, 320MHz, 16+ spatial streams) are priced between US$250 and US$1500 .
This pricing structure reflects an industry reality: the added value of the module segment largely depends on its "conversion efficiency" to chip capabilities . The same Wi-Fi 7 chip can exhibit significantly different RF performance, heat dissipation characteristics, power consumption curves, and driver compatibility in designs from different module manufacturers. As a carrier-grade product, FTTR gateways have higher requirements for long-term operational stability, environmental adaptability, and batch consistency than consumer-grade products. When selecting module solutions, OEMs focus not only on "Wi-Fi 7 support" but also on "whether the nominal performance can be stably reproduced under mass production conditions."
From a supply chain perspective, Qualcomm's QCC2072 provides the foundational capabilities for the protocol layer as a chip platform, while module manufacturers focus on RF front-end matching, antenna design coordination, power management optimization, driver adaptation and verification, and engineering implementation for different package types. The value of this layer lies not in the chip definition stage, but in the product realization stage.
V. Conclusion: Module Selection Logic in Centralized Procurement Scenarios
The successful procurement of home gateways by China Telecom and China Mobile in 2026 marks the official launch of large-scale deployment of Wi-Fi 7 in operator home network terminals. The distributed architecture of FTTR and the product requirements for carriers impose engineering constraints on radio frequency modules that differ from those on consumer-grade routers.
In a supply chain system driven by centralized procurement, the competitiveness of a module solution depends on the comprehensive performance of three dimensions: protocol compatibility with FTTR scenarios, hardware adaptability across multiple packaging forms, and driver maturity under the Linux/OpenWrt platform. The O2072PM's eMLSR implementation, Aux Radio power management, and tri-band 320MHz capability technically address the core needs of FTTR sub-routers and home gateways; its M.2 and surface-mount dual packaging forms cover the hardware architecture choices of different OEMs; and its Intel x86 and OpenWrt driver adaptation provides a verifiable starting point for complete system development.
The transmission cycle of operator centralized procurement dictates that OEMs' module selection decisions often occur during the solution design phase before the procurement announcement. Within this time window, module solutions with a complete RF parameter system, multiple packaging options, and verifiable driver adaptation records occupy a more advantageous position in OEMs' technical evaluations .
